Know what the patent examiner will find — before you spend $15k filing.
A fixed-fee prior-art evidence binder on your invention, delivered in 5 business days. The rigor of a $3,000 attorney search package — built on real search infrastructure, human-reviewed, with citations your patent attorney can use directly.
A filing decision packet, before the legal bill compounds
Inventors need a plain-English novelty read plus the source evidence their attorney can actually use.
A concrete artifact or pilot scope, not a generic discovery call.
Fat Tailed Solutions builds, ships, and runs the system.
This page captures the context needed to reply without a second intake step.
A filing decision packet, before the legal bill compounds
Inventors need a plain-English novelty read plus the source evidence their attorney can actually use.
- Work product
- A concrete artifact or pilot scope, not a generic discovery call.
- Operating owner
- Fat Tailed Solutions builds, ships, and runs the system.
- Request path
- This page captures the context needed to reply without a second intake step.
- Human gate
- Nothing is sold or turned on without a scoped follow-up.
- Source context
- The reply is tied to the offer and page that brought you here.
- Fallback
- The original Google Form stays available if the embedded request path fails.
Filing blind is expensive
- Attorney search-plus-opinion packages run $2,500–$4,000 — and the search inside is often an $800 outsourced job, marked up.
- DIY Google Patents sessions give you false confidence, not coverage.
- An office action citing art you never saw costs months and thousands in attorney responses.
- Investors ask “how do you know this is novel?” and you don't have a real answer.
What you get
- Governed searches across the full USPTO corpus plus non-patent literature.
- A litigation-grade evidence binder: closest references, claim-relevance notes, full citations, complete audit trail of every search run.
- A plain-English risk read: what looks clear, what's crowded, what to design around.
- PDF deliverable your attorney can drop straight into their workflow.
- 30-minute walkthrough call with the engineer who ran the search.
How it works
- 1
Describe the invention
A one-page disclosure or a 20-minute call — whatever you have.
- 2
We run the search
Systematic, budget-capped queries with an auditable trail — not a keyword skim.
- 3
Binder in 5 days
Evidence, risk read, and walkthrough. Use it to file smarter or pivot early.
50% deposit to reserve, balance on delivery. 5 business-day turnaround. If we find nothing useful, you pay only the deposit.
Reserve your evidence binder
Tell me roughly what the invention does (no confidential detail needed yet) and where you are in the filing process.
Skip the pitch. Tell us the live situation: what happens today, where it breaks, and what would prove this belongs in your workflow.
- Current state
- Tools, volume, team, or workflow as it works today.
- Where it breaks
- Missed calls, slow searches, manual rework, risk, or revenue slipping away.
- First useful proof
- The one result that would make you say: yes, keep going.
A straight fit/no-fit read, a small first move, and the evidence we’d use to judge whether it worked.
No client files, passwords, private matter facts, or account access in the first note. Rough context is enough.