We find the 10 hours a week your team wastes — and automate them in a fixed-fee, two-week pilot.
Not a strategy deck. A working automation in production in 14 days: intake, document processing, reporting, phone/email workflows — built by engineers who run AI systems in production, priced so the decision is easy.
One annoying workflow, mapped and automated with proof
The request starts a scoped buyer conversation with the system, artifact, and human review path visible up front.
A concrete artifact or pilot scope, not a generic discovery call.
Fat Tailed Solutions builds, ships, and runs the system.
This page captures the context needed to reply without a second intake step.
One annoying workflow, mapped and automated with proof
The request starts a scoped buyer conversation with the system, artifact, and human review path visible up front.
- Work product
- A concrete artifact or pilot scope, not a generic discovery call.
- Operating owner
- Fat Tailed Solutions builds, ships, and runs the system.
- Request path
- This page captures the context needed to reply without a second intake step.
- Human gate
- Nothing is sold or turned on without a scoped follow-up.
- Source context
- The reply is tied to the offer and page that brought you here.
- First move
- The next step should be small enough to prove value before anything expands.
You know it's automatable. It just never happens.
- Your team re-keys the same data between systems every single day.
- AI consultants sell 6-month roadmaps; you need something working this month.
- Off-the-shelf tools cover 80% and the last 20% is why you still do it by hand.
- Every quarter you don't automate, the payroll cost of manual work compounds.
What you get
- A working automation deployed in your environment in 14 days — not a prototype, not a deck.
- Fixed scope agreed in writing: the workflow, the volume, the acceptance test.
- Documentation and a runbook your team owns — no black box, no lock-in.
- A measured before/after: hours saved, error rate, cost per unit of work.
- A prioritized map of your next three highest-ROI automations.
How it works
- 1
Workflow audit call
45 minutes with the person who owns the process. We pick one workflow worth automating.
- 2
Two-week build
We build, test against real data, and deploy with your team in the loop.
- 3
Measure and decide
Acceptance test passes, your team runs it, and you decide what's next — no obligation.
$2,450 to schedule, $2,450 on acceptance. Scope and acceptance test agreed in writing before work starts.
- A working automation deployed in your environment (typical agency quote: 6–10 weeks)$12,000+
- Documentation + runbook your team owns — no black box, no lock-in$1,500
- Measured before/after: hours saved, error rate, cost per unit of work$900
- Prioritized map of your next 3 highest-ROI automations$1,500
- BONUS: 30 days of post-launch support and fixes$990
- Total value$16,800+
- Your price$4,900 fixed — two weeks
The Pass-the-Test Guarantee
We write the acceptance test together before work begins. If the automation doesn't pass it, you pay nothing — the deposit comes back, and you keep everything we built. We can offer this because we've done it before and we scope honestly.
Free workflow audit — leave with a plan either way
45 minutes with the engineer, not a salesperson. We map your most painful manual workflow, estimate hours recoverable and payback period, and tell you honestly if automation isn't worth it. The one-page automation map is yours to keep — or to hand to whoever builds it.
Book my free auditBook a free workflow audit
Describe the manual process that annoys you most — we'll tell you honestly whether it's automatable and what it would take.
Skip the pitch. Tell us the live situation: what happens today, where it breaks, and what would prove this belongs in your workflow.
- Current state
- Tools, volume, team, or workflow as it works today.
- Where it breaks
- Missed calls, slow searches, manual rework, risk, or revenue slipping away.
- First useful proof
- The one result that would make you say: yes, keep going.
A straight fit/no-fit read, a small first move, and the evidence we’d use to judge whether it worked.
No client files, passwords, private matter facts, or account access in the first note. Rough context is enough.